PREDICTING ACADEMIC SUCCESS WITH MACHINE LEARNING: A SIMULATION-BASED ANALYTICS FRAMEWORK FOR A REGIONAL UNIVERSITY IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Kodirov Abdujabbor Sirojiddin Ugli email: abdujabborqodirov@gmail.com ORCID iD: 0009-0004-3929-5480 International Joint Degree Program, Termez State University and Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

Keywords:

learning analytics; machine learning; academic performance prediction; Random Forest; early warning systems; higher education; Uzbekistan; educational data mining

Abstract

Higher education institutions in developing regions increasingly generate large volumes of student data, yet most continue to rely on manual, retrospective evaluation rather than predictive analytics. This study examines whether supervised machine learning can support early identification of academically at-risk students at Termez State University, Uzbekistan, a context in which empirical evidence on educational analytics remains scarce. A simulated institutional dataset of 2,450 undergraduate records, constructed to reflect realistic academic, attendance, demographic, and digital-engagement parameters, was used to train and compare four classifiers: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network. Academic success was operationalised as a binary outcome (GPA ≥ 2.50 versus GPA < 2.50). Descriptive and correlation analyses preceded model training on an 80/20 split, with performance evaluated via accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and confusion matrices. Random Forest achieved the strongest performance (accuracy = 0.89, F1 = 0.86, ROC-AUC = 0.91), outperforming the Artificial Neural Network (0.87), Support Vector Machine (0.85), and Logistic Regression (0.82). Final examination score, attendance rate, assignment score, and previous GPA were the most influential predictors, while demographic variables contributed minimally. Approximately 24% of students were classified as academically at risk. The findings suggest that ensemble learning methods offer a feasible, interpretable foundation for early-warning systems in resource-constrained regional universities, while underscoring the need for real institutional data, broader psychosocial variables, and explicit governance safeguards before operational deployment.

References

Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Keight, R., Laws, A., & Radi, N. (2019). Machine learning approaches to predict student academic performance. Applied Computing and Informatics, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.002

Arnold, K., & Pistilli, M. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. LAK '12 Proceedings, 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

Baker, R., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic fairness and machine learning in education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7437

Costa, E. B., Fonseca, B., Santana, M. A., de Araújo, F. F., & Rego, J. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.047

Costa, E. B., Fonseca, B., Santana, M., de Araújo, F., & Rego, J. (2017). Evaluating student dropout risk using machine learning techniques. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 364–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757013

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daniel, B. (2019). Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12723

Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2020). Student academic performance prediction using supervised learning techniques. IEEE Access, 8, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2965271

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. (2020). Utilising artificial intelligence to support teacher data analytics literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106506

Jayaprakash, S. M., Moody, E. W., Lauría, E. J. M., Regan, J. R., & Baron, J. D. (2014). Early alert of academically at-risk students: An open source analytics initiative. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1), 6–47. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.11.3

Kizilcec, R. F., & Brooks, C. (2017). Personalized support improves execution and course completion in MOOCs. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.41.3

Lu, H., Li, Y., & Chen, M. (2021). Deep learning for education analytics and prediction. IEEE Access, 9, 40334–40351. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064320

Mduma, N. (2023). Data balancing techniques for predicting student dropout using machine learning. Data, 8(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8030049

Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100152.

Nnadi, L. C., Watanobe, Y., Rahman, M. M., & John-Otumu, A. M. (2024). Prediction of students' adaptability using explainable AI in educational machine learning models. Applied Sciences, 14(12), 5141. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125141

Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64.

Pek, R. Z., Ozyer, S. T., Elhage, T., Ozyer, T., & Alhajj, R. (2023). The role of machine learning in identifying students at-risk and minimizing failure. IEEE Access, 11, 1224–1243. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232984

Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2017). An ethics framework for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12261

Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and machine learning: A decade review. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355

Sharipov, J., & Tashpulatova, D. (2022). Education digitalisation in Uzbekistan: Current issues and future opportunities. Central Asian Journal of Education and Technology, 3(2), 55–68.

Note. References by Memarian and Doleck (2023), Mduma (2023), Nnadi et al. (2024), and Pek et al. (2023) are suggested additions (2022–2026) proposed by the writer to strengthen currency on explainability, class-imbalance handling, and fairness in educational machine learning; they were not cited in the original thesis. All other references were drawn from the original thesis reference list.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21