SPOKEN DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Asrorova Nargiza Isomitdinovna nibotova@gmail.com Senior Teacher Tashkent International University of Finance and Management Technologies Author

Keywords:

spoken discourse analysis, methodological approach, frameworks, social interaction, ethical considerations.

Abstract

Selecting a methodological approach is fundamental in spoken discourse analysis, the systematic study of how language functions in social interaction. This choice is critical as it reveals underlying power dynamics, identity construction, and social structures within everyday talk. Key frameworks include Conversation Analysis (CA), which focuses on interactional structures; Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), which examines language in relation to power and ideology; and qualitative content analysis. The field involves ongoing debates, particularly concerning the merits of qualitative versus quantitative methods and the role of researcher subjectivity. Ethical considerations, such as informed consent and cultural context, are also paramount. Ultimately, the chosen approach directly shapes the research methodology, data interpretation, and the resulting insights, which can inform practices in fields like education, healthcare, and politics. A careful, theoretically-grounded selection is therefore essential for meaningful scholarly contribution.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.

Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house.” Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12–26. Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106.

Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds.). (2021). The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies. Cambridge University Press.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.

Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128–148.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851.

Wetherall, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Discourse theory and practice: A reader. Sage Publications.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-19