A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WORD ORDER IN QUESTIONS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Allayorova Mohidil Chirchik State Pedagogical University 4th year student of the Faculty of Tourism, Foreign Language and Literature (English). Author
  • Allayorova Mohidil Chirchik State Pedagogical University 4th year student of the Faculty of Tourism, Foreign Language and Literature (English). Author
  • Rozikova Zilola Tursunboy qizi Supervisor Teacher of Chirchik State Pedagogical University Author

Keywords:

Word order, question formation, English, Uzbek, syntax, Subject-Auxiliary Inversion, SOV, SVO, yes/no questions, wh-questions, question particles, auxiliary verbs, typological comparison, linguistic differences, language learning.

Abstract

This article examines the structural differences and similarities between English and Uzbek question formation. English follows a Subject-Auxiliary Inversion (SAI) rule, whereas Uzbek, an agglutinative language, primarily relies on question particles and intonation. This study highlights the syntactic patterns, typological contrasts, and implications for language learners.

The research employs a comparative linguistic approach, analyzing syntactic patterns, typological contrasts, and the implications for language learners. The findings highlight key differences, such as the role of auxiliary verbs in English and the reliance on question particles in Uzbek. Additionally, similarities, such as the use of interrogative pronouns and intonation for yes/no questions, are discussed.

Understanding these structural differences is crucial for learners transitioning between the two languages, as English speakers may struggle with the absence of auxiliary-dependent inversion in Uzbek, while Uzbek speakers may find the English inversion rule challenging. This study contributes to linguistic research by providing insights into the syntactic strategies employed by both languages and their impact on second-language acquisition.

References

1.Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. (1990). A Student's Grammar of the English Language. Longman.

2.Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge University Press.

3.Johanson, L. (1998). The Structure of Turkic Languages. Routledge.

4.Matyoqubov, S. (2005). O‘zbek Tilining Grammatikasi. Toshkent: Fan Nashriyoti.

5.Rozikova, Z. (2023). MAKTABGACHA TA’LIM TASHKILOTLARIDA XORIJIY TILNI O’QITISH VA DARSDA TIL O’RGANISH ILOVALARIDAN FOYDALANISH. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 5(5).

6.Rozikova, Z. (2023). ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE LEARNING APPLICATIONS. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 4(6), 237-242..

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20