FEATURES OF EXPRESSING ADVICE IN ENGLISH, UZBEK AND RUSSIAN COMMUNICATIVE CULTURES
Abstract
Despite the fact that in speech act Advice is aimed at the interests of the listener, in general, like all urges, it is a "dangerous"(to a greater or lesser extent depending on the culture). First of all, this concerns English communication, where advice can be regarded as an attack on the interlocutor's independence, his personal autonomy, the speaker's imposition of his will. The most "dangerous" is unsolicited advice, i.e. advice given by the speaker on his own initiative, i.e. without any invitation to it from the listener.
References
1. Belyaeva-Standen, E. I. (2004). Intercultural Pragmatics: A Russian-American Dialogue. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures.
2. Visson, L. (2003). Understanding Americans: A Guide to Intercultural Communication. Moscow: R. Valent.
3. Sergeeva, A. V. (2004). Features of Russian Communicative Behaviour in Informal Situations. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, (3), 85–90.
4. Arkhipenkova, A. Y. (2006). Advice as a Speech Act: An Intercultural Aspect. Tomsk State University Bulletin, (292), 58–63.
5. SSRL (1980). Dictionary of Contemporary Russian Language. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk.
6. Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1994). A Communicative Grammar of English (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
7. Murphy, R. (2003). English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Ockenden, J. (1997). Practising English Usage in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. (2007). Oxford: Macmillan Education.
10. Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Qodirova, D. (2017). Linguocultural Features of Giving Advice. Issues of Philology, (4), 75–81 (Originally published in Uzbek)