AKADEMIK LITSEYLARDA FIZIKA FANINI O‘QITISHDA INNOVATSION PEDAGOGIK TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH

Authors

  • Abbosov Dilshodjon Abdug’afforovich Author
  • Ne'matjonov Shuxratjon Rustamjon o’g’li Author

Keywords:

fizika ta’limi, akademik litsey, innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalar, interfaol metodlar, virtual laboratoriya, STEAM, kompetensiyaviy yondashuv.

Abstract

Ushbu ilmiy maqolada akademik litseylarda fizika fanini o‘qitish jarayonida innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalardan foydalanishning nazariy va amaliy ahamiyati tahlil qilinadi. Maqolada zamonaviy ta’lim sharoitida fizika fanini o‘qitishda interfaol metodlar, axborot-kommunikatsiya texnologiyalari, virtual laboratoriyalar, muammoli ta’lim, loyiha asosida o‘qitish va STEAM yondashuvining o‘rni yoritiladi. Shuningdek, innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalarning o‘quvchilarda mustaqil fikrlash, ilmiy dunyoqarash, tajribaviy ko‘nikma va amaliy kompetensiyalarni shakllantirishdagi samaradorligi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqotda akademik litsey o‘quvchilarining fizika faniga bo‘lgan qiziqishini oshirish, mavzularni chuqur o‘zlashtirish va nazariy bilimlarni amaliy jarayonlar bilan bog‘lashda zamonaviy pedagogik yondashuvlarning ahamiyati ilmiy asosda tahlil qilingan.

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ta’lim to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. — Toshkent, 2020.

2. Azizxo‘jayeva N.N. Pedagogik texnologiyalar va pedagogik mahorat. — Toshkent: O‘zbekiston yozuvchilar uyushmasi Adabiyot jamg‘armasi nashriyoti, 2006.

3. Ishmuhamedov R.J., Yuldashev M.A. Ta’lim va tarbiyada innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalar. — Toshkent: Nihol, 2013.

4. Tolipov O‘.Q., Usmonboyeva M. Pedagogik texnologiyalarning tatbiqiy asoslari. — Toshkent: Fan, 2006.

5. Sayidahmedov N. Yangi pedagogik texnologiyalar. — Toshkent: Moliya, 2003.

6. G‘ulomov S.S., Begalov B.A. Informatika va axborot texnologiyalari. — Toshkent: Fan, 2010.

7. Jo‘rayev M. Fizika o‘qitish metodikasi. — Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 2015.

8. Wieman C.E., Perkins K.K., Adams W.K. Oersted Medal Lecture 2007: Interactive simulations for teaching physics: What works, what doesn’t, and why // American Journal of Physics. — 2008. — Vol. 76, №4. — P. 393–399.

9. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses // American Journal of Physics. — 1998. — Vol. 66, №1. — P. 64–74.

10. PhET Interactive Simulations. University of Colorado Boulder: Free science and mathematics simulations for teaching STEM topics. — 2024.

11. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2004. — Vol. 93, №3. — P. 223–231.

12. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M.P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2014. — Vol. 111, №23. — P. 8410–8415.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20